City Bank v. Kent

7 La. 60
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 15, 1844
StatusPublished

This text of 7 La. 60 (City Bank v. Kent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City Bank v. Kent, 7 La. 60 (La. 1844).

Opinion

Bullard, J.

The appellee moves to dismiss this appeal, on the ground that no bond was given and no citation issued until more than a year after the rendition of the judgment, although the appeal was allowed within the year. '

[61]*61The question is not an open one. In the cases of Marigny v. Stanley et al., and Marigny v. Ingraham, this court held, that if the appellant do not comply with the condition on which the appeal was granted, by giving bond to prosecute the appeal, and suffer a year to elapse, the judgment becomes res judicata, and he cannot be relieved either in the District or Supreme Court. 2 La. 322, 324. 3 Robinson, 77.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marigny v. Stanley
2 La. 322 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1831)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 La. 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-bank-v-kent-la-1844.