City Bank of New Orleans v. Johnson

1 La. Ann. 246
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 15, 1846·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The judgment of tho court was pronounced by

Eustis, C. J.

Tho defendant and appellant, drawer of a promissory note, has pleaded in this court the proscription of five years, on an appeal taken from a judgment against him. J3y articlo 3427 of the Civil Codo, prescription may be pleaded on the appeal.

The appellant made an application to filo his pica, on a motion for a new trial in the court below. The appolleo has requested that, in tho event of the plea being received, the case be remanded for a new trial. This he has a right to require.

Sherburne and J. B. Smith, for the plaintiffs. P. A, Morsa and Roysdon, for the appellant.

The judgment is therefore reversed, and the case remanded for a new trial; the appellee paying the costs of this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City Bank of New Orleans v. Johnson, 1 La. Ann. 246 (La. 1846).

1 La. Ann. 246 (City Bank of New Orleans v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lafleur Buick Co. v. Tatman
62 So. 2d 199 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1952)