City Bank Farmers Trust Company v. McCutcheon

Supreme Court of New Jersey

City Bank Farmers Trust Company v. McCutcheon

154 A. 626, 108 N.J.L. 185, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 237

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedApril 24, 1931

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 154 A. 626 (City Bank Farmers Trust Company v. McCutcheon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City Bank Farmers Trust Company v. McCutcheon, 154 A. 626, 108 N.J.L. 185, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 237 (N.J. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court, so far as it treats of the matters argued on this appeal. The point relating to the method of valuation, which is discussed by the Supreme Court, is not argued here and we have not considered it.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Dear, JJ. 8.

For reversal — Bodine, Kays, JJ. 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court, so far as it treats of the matters argued on this appeal. The point relating to the method of valuation, which is discussed by the Supreme Court, is not argued here and we have not considered it.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Dear, JJ. 8.

For reversal — Bodine, Kays, JJ. 2.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 A. 626, 108 N.J.L. 185, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-bank-farmers-trust-company-v-mccutcheon-nj-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack