City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Smith

238 A.D. 742, 265 N.Y.S. 654, 1933 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9607
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 30, 1933·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The dismissal of the complaint was proper.

The facts alleged fail to justify the trustee seeking instructions of the court. The trustees are required to exercise their own judgment and discretion in many instances. Under the lease already approved by the court the trustee has definite rights and adequate remedies. Were the court in such an instance to entertain applications for instructions, trustees would become mere ministerial agents and the courts would be overrun with applications of like character.

The orders appealed from should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.

Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.; Finch, P. J., and Merrell, J., dissent and vote to reverse and deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Smith, 238 A.D. 742, 265 N.Y.S. 654, 1933 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9607 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

238 A.D. 742 (City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Wortman
2024 NY Slip Op 24303 (Monroe Surrogate's Court, 2024)
In re the Intermediate Accounting of Trachtman
22 Misc. 2d 681 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1960)