City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Roosen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Roosen

258 A.D. 788, 16 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6919

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 17, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 788 (City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Roosen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Roosen, 258 A.D. 788, 16 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present —- Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.; Martin, P. J., and Callahan, J., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial on the ground that the court in the exercise of its discretion should have permitted the plaintiff to call the defendant, after having reversed its determination on the motion to dismiss the complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present —- Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.; Martin, P. J., and Callahan, J., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial on the ground that the court in the exercise of its discretion should have permitted the plaintiff to call the defendant, after having reversed its determination on the motion to dismiss the complaint.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 788, 16 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-bank-farmers-trust-co-v-roosen-nyappdiv-1939.