City and County of Denver v. Bacino
This text of 224 P.2d 219 (City and County of Denver v. Bacino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
Sam BACINO, Defendant In Error.
Supreme Court of Colorado, en Banc.
J. Glenn Donaldson, Abe L. Hoffman, and Patricia Maloy, all of Denver, for plaintiff in error.
No appearance for defendant in error.
HOLLAND, Justice.
The instant case presents the same issue which was considered and determined in City and County of Denver v. Bridwell, Colo., 224 P.2d 217; consequently our decision in the latter case is applicable and controlling in the present litigation; accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
224 P.2d 219, 122 Colo. 509, 1950 Colo. LEXIS 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-and-county-of-denver-v-bacino-colo-1950.