City and County of Denver v. Bacino
224 P.2d 219, 122 Colo. 509, 1950 Colo. LEXIS 277
Opinion
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
Sam BACINO, Defendant In Error.
Supreme Court of Colorado, en Banc.
J. Glenn Donaldson, Abe L. Hoffman, and Patricia Maloy, all of Denver, for plaintiff in error.
No appearance for defendant in error.
HOLLAND, Justice.
The instant case presents the same issue which was considered and determined in City and County of Denver v. Bridwell, Colo., 224 P.2d 217; consequently our decision in the latter case is applicable and controlling in the present litigation; accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City and County of Denver v. Bacino, 224 P.2d 219, 122 Colo. 509, 1950 Colo. LEXIS 277 (Colo. 1950).
224 P.2d 219 (City and County of Denver v. Bacino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Welch v. City and County of Denver
349 P.2d 352 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1960)
Stalford v. Board of County Commissioners
263 P.2d 436 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1953)