Citrus Central v. Gardner
543 So. 2d 440, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1260, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2821, 1989 WL 52831
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 23, 1989
DocketNo. 88-2732
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 543 So. 2d 440 (Citrus Central v. Gardner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Citrus Central v. Gardner, 543 So. 2d 440, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1260, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2821, 1989 WL 52831 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
Opinion
Appellants have moved for remand of this appeal, showing that no transcript of the hearing can be prepared and that the parties and the deputy commissioner have been unable to prepare a satisfactory statement of the evidence. Under the circumstances, we must reverse and remand for a hearing de novo. See Arnold Lumber Company v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Citrus Central v. Gardner
569 So. 2d 936 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Dellecese v. Value Rent a Car
543 So. 2d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
543 So. 2d 440, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1260, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2821, 1989 WL 52831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citrus-central-v-gardner-fladistctapp-1989.