Citrus Central v. Gardner
543 So. 2d 440, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1260, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2821, 1989 WL 52831
Opinion
Appellants have moved for remand of this appeal, showing that no transcript of the hearing can be prepared and that the parties and the deputy commissioner have been unable to prepare a satisfactory statement of the evidence. Under the circumstances, we must reverse and remand for a hearing de novo. See Arnold Lumber Company v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Citrus Central v. Gardner, 543 So. 2d 440, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1260, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2821, 1989 WL 52831 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
543 So. 2d 440 (Citrus Central v. Gardner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Citrus Central v. Gardner
569 So. 2d 936 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Dellecese v. Value Rent a Car
543 So. 2d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)