Citron v. Nulty

260 A.D. 904, 23 N.Y.S.2d 838, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5306

This text of 260 A.D. 904 (Citron v. Nulty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Citron v. Nulty, 260 A.D. 904, 23 N.Y.S.2d 838, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5306 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Order entered January 12, 1940, denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the respondents. Order entered April 11, 1940, so far as appealed from, striking out the first and second separate defenses in the amended answer, unanimously reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellants, and plaintiffs’ motion in all respects denied, on the ground that the third and fourth defenses contained in the amended answer present issues of fact which preclude the granting of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. (King Motor Sales Corp. v. Allen, 209 App. Div. 281.) Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Hntermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

H. C. King Motor Sales Corp. v. Allen
209 A.D. 281 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 A.D. 904, 23 N.Y.S.2d 838, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citron-v-nulty-nyappdiv-1940.