Citrix Systems, Inc. v. 01 Communique Laboratory, Inc.
This text of Citrix Systems, Inc. v. 01 Communique Laboratory, Inc. (Citrix Systems, Inc. v. 01 Communique Laboratory, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant,
v.
01 COMMUNIQUE LABORATORY, INC., Appellee. ______________________
2014-1240 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,018. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
DOUGLAS J. KLINE, Goodwin Procter LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were KENNETH E. RADCLIFFE; and JENNIFER A. ALBERT and WILLIAM M. JAY, of Washington, DC.
KENNETH J. SHEEHAN, Baker & Hostetler LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the brief was SHAWNNA M. YASHAR. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, BRYSON and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 16, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Citrix Systems, Inc. v. 01 Communique Laboratory, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citrix-systems-inc-v-01-communique-laboratory-inc-cafc-2014.