Citowitz v. City of New York

54 A.D.2d 749

This text of 54 A.D.2d 749 (Citowitz v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Citowitz v. City of New York, 54 A.D.2d 749 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

In consolidated negligence actions to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., appellants, two of the defendants in Action No. 3, appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 17, 1976, as granted the branches of the motion of the plaintiffs in said action which sought leave to serve an amended complaint against them, containing a cause of action pursuant to section 205-a of the General Municipal Law. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. The order granting leave to amend the complaint was a proper exercise of discretion. Such leave is freely given. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Shapiro and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 A.D.2d 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citowitz-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1976.