Citizens v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

602 So. 2d 691, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8858
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 5, 1992·No. No. 91-1068·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant concedes that the trial court erred by concluding that section 697.-07, Florida Statutes, does not apply retroactively. That issue was resolved by this court in Nassau Square Assoc. Ltd. v. Insurance Comm’r of California, 579 So.2d 259 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

Here, a mortgagor executed an assignment of rents to a mortgagee. Applying section 697.07 retroactively, the assignment of rents became absolute upon the mortgagor’s default and written demand by the assignee-mortgagee. Section 697.07, Fla. Stat. (1989). Therefore, the appellee was not entitled to garnishment of the rents with respect to which the appellant has a valid and enforceable priority interest. The trial court’s order on the motion to dissolve writ of garnishment is reversed and remanded.

LETTS, STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Citizens v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., 602 So. 2d 691, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8858 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

602 So. 2d 691 (Citizens v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howard Savings Bank v. Eastern Federal Corp.
614 So. 2d 1162 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)