Citizens Task Force on Sohio v. Board of Harbor Commissioners

California Supreme Court

Citizens Task Force on Sohio v. Board of Harbor Commissioners

591 P.2d 1236, 23 Cal. 3d 812, 153 Cal. Rptr. 584, 1979 Cal. LEXIS 229

California Supreme Court·Decided March 22, 1979·No. L.A. 30922·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

*814 Opinion

When two or more public agencies equally qualify as the lead agency for the purpose of preparing an EIR, “the agency which is to act first on the project in question shall be the Lead Agency (following the principle that the environmental impact should be assessed as early as possible in governmental planning).” (Cal. Admin. Code, tit. 14, § 15065, subd. (c).) Because the Port was the first to act on the Sohio project, it became the lead agency and hence was required to defend the adequacy of the entire EIR under Public Resources Code section ,21167; the PUC thereby became a “responsible” agency {id., § 21069), whose actions are governed by section 21167.3. Accordingly, although the PUC could not properly be made a party because its joinder would “deprive the court of jurisdiction over the subject matter” (Code Civ. Proc., § 389, subd. (a)), the court should have permitted the action to proceed against the Port alone.

For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that the above-entitled cause be transferred to the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.

Bird, C. J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*814 Opinion

When two or more public agencies equally qualify as the lead agency for the purpose of preparing an EIR, “the agency which is to act first on the project in question shall be the Lead Agency (following the principle that the environmental impact should be assessed as early as possible in governmental planning).” (Cal. Admin. Code, tit. 14, § 15065, subd. (c).) Because the Port was the first to act on the Sohio project, it became the lead agency and hence was required to defend the adequacy of the entire EIR under Public Resources Code section ,21167; the PUC thereby became a “responsible” agency {id., § 21069), whose actions are governed by section 21167.3. Accordingly, although the PUC could not properly be made a party because its joinder would “deprive the court of jurisdiction over the subject matter” (Code Civ. Proc., § 389, subd. (a)), the court should have permitted the action to proceed against the Port alone.

For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that the above-entitled cause be transferred to the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.

Bird, C. J., did not participate.

Citizens Task Force on Sohio v. Board of Harbor Commissioners, 591 P.2d 1236, 23 Cal. 3d 812, 153 Cal. Rptr. 584, 1979 Cal. LEXIS 229 (Cal. 1979).

Pincite

591 P.2d 1236 (Citizens Task Force on Sohio v. Board of Harbor Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related