Citizens & Southern National Bank v. Conner

11 S.E.2d 271, 195 S.C. 203, 131 A.L.R. 748, 1940 S.C. LEXIS 157
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided October 30, 1940·No. 15150·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Baker.

The sole question raised by this appeal, as stated by appellant, is: “Where a state bank was named as a co-executor and trustee under a will, and duly qualified thereunder as such co-executor and entered upon the discharge of its duties as such, and subsequently was converted into a national bank, *213 did the national bank continue as the co-executor and the trustee, with the right and power to continue so to act?”

The carefully prepared order of Honorable Wm. H. Grim-ball, Judge of the Ninth Circuit, correctly answers this question in the affirmative. Let said order be reported^ as the opinion of this Court.

Mr. Chiee Justice Bonham, Messrs. Justices Fishburne and Stukes and Mr. Acting Associate Justice L. D. LidE concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Citizens & Southern National Bank v. Conner, 11 S.E.2d 271, 195 S.C. 203, 131 A.L.R. 748, 1940 S.C. LEXIS 157 (S.C. 1940).

11 S.E.2d 271 (Citizens & Southern National Bank v. Conner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gulf Nat. Bank v. Le Boeuf
47 So. 2d 687 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1950)