Citizens & Southern National Bank v. Conner
This text of 11 S.E.2d 271 (Citizens & Southern National Bank v. Conner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The sole question raised by this appeal, as stated by appellant, is: “Where a state bank was named as a co-executor and trustee under a will, and duly qualified thereunder as such co-executor and entered upon the discharge of its duties as such, and subsequently was converted into a national bank, *213 did the national bank continue as the co-executor and the trustee, with the right and power to continue so to act?”
The carefully prepared order of Honorable Wm. H. Grim-ball, Judge of the Ninth Circuit, correctly answers this question in the affirmative. Let said order be reported^ as the opinion of this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 S.E.2d 271, 195 S.C. 203, 131 A.L.R. 748, 1940 S.C. LEXIS 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citizens-southern-national-bank-v-conner-sc-1940.