Citizens & Southern Bank v. Lewis

126 S.E. 392, 159 Ga. 551, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 17
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 15, 1925·No. No. 4248·Published

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. The motion to dismiss the application for certiorari and the order granting the same is without merit. '

2. Upon consideration of the decision rendered by the Court of Appeals in this ease, the judgment of that court is affirmed. Strickland v. Bank of Cartersville, 141 Ga. 565 (5), 566 (81 S. E. 886); Scott v. Saffold, 37 Ga. 384; Randolph v. Fleming, 59 Ga. 776; Civil Code of 1910, §§ 3543, 3544.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except 6ilbert, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Citizens & Southern Bank v. Lewis, 126 S.E. 392, 159 Ga. 551, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 17 (Ga. 1925).

126 S.E. 392 (Citizens & Southern Bank v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. Saffold
37 Ga. 384 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1867)
Randolph v. Fleming
59 Ga. 776 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1877)
Strickland v. Bank of Cartersville
81 S.E. 886 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1914)