Citizens & Southern Bank v. Lewis

126 S.E. 392, 159 Ga. 551, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 17
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1925
DocketNo. 4248
StatusPublished

This text of 126 S.E. 392 (Citizens & Southern Bank v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Citizens & Southern Bank v. Lewis, 126 S.E. 392, 159 Ga. 551, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 17 (Ga. 1925).

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. The motion to dismiss the application for certiorari and the order granting the same is without merit. '

2. Upon consideration of the decision rendered by the Court of Appeals in this ease, the judgment of that court is affirmed. Strickland v. Bank of Cartersville, 141 Ga. 565 (5), 566 (81 S. E. 886); Scott v. Saffold, 37 Ga. 384; Randolph v. Fleming, 59 Ga. 776; Civil Code of 1910, §§ 3543, 3544.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except 6ilbert, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. Saffold
37 Ga. 384 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1867)
Randolph v. Fleming
59 Ga. 776 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1877)
Strickland v. Bank of Cartersville
81 S.E. 886 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 S.E. 392, 159 Ga. 551, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citizens-southern-bank-v-lewis-ga-1925.