Citizens & Southern Bank v. Blount
125 S.E. 420, 130 S.C. 320, 1924 S.C. LEXIS 84
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
After a careful review and analysis of the evidence and mature consideration thereof, in the light of our decisions (see, especially, Miller v. Erwin, 125 S. E., 36, recently filed), we cannot hold that the showing made by appellants warrants a reversal of the concurrent findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Special Master and Circuit Judge.
For the reasons therein stated, the decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Citizens & Southern Bank v. Blount, 125 S.E. 420, 130 S.C. 320, 1924 S.C. LEXIS 84 (S.C. 1924).
125 S.E. 420 (Citizens & Southern Bank v. Blount) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. Erwin
125 S.E. 36 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1924)