Citizens Savings Bank v. 1722 Caton Avenue Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Citizens Savings Bank v. 1722 Caton Avenue Corp.

256 A.D. 1084, 12 N.Y.S.2d 354, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6235

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 10, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D. 1084 (Citizens Savings Bank v. 1722 Caton Avenue Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Citizens Savings Bank v. 1722 Caton Avenue Corp., 256 A.D. 1084, 12 N.Y.S.2d 354, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6235 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to foreclose mortgages on real property, order granting appellant’s motion to amend the summons herein but denying the motion in all other respects modified by striking out the last ordering paragraph and inserting in place thereof a provision granting appellant’s motion to strike out the answer of respondent 1722 Catón Avenue Corporation and to dismiss the counterclaim therein contained and for an order of reference to compute and for the relief demanded in the complaint; and, as thus modified, the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. The record presents no triable issue. Lazansky, P. J-, Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur. •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose mortgages on real property, order granting appellant’s motion to amend the summons herein but denying the motion in all other respects modified by striking out the last ordering paragraph and inserting in place thereof a provision granting appellant’s motion to strike out the answer of respondent 1722 Catón Avenue Corporation and to dismiss the counterclaim therein contained and for an order of reference to compute and for the relief demanded in the complaint; and, as thus modified, the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. The record presents no triable issue. Lazansky, P. J-, Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur. •

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 1084, 12 N.Y.S.2d 354, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citizens-savings-bank-v-1722-caton-avenue-corp-nyappdiv-1939.