Citizens Property Insurance Corporation v. Maylin Rodriguez

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 13, 2024
Docket2023-0312
StatusPublished

This text of Citizens Property Insurance Corporation v. Maylin Rodriguez (Citizens Property Insurance Corporation v. Maylin Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Citizens Property Insurance Corporation v. Maylin Rodriguez, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed March 13, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-312 Lower Tribunal No. 15-12214 ________________

Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, Appellant,

vs.

Maylin Rodriguez, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Peter R. Lopez, Judge.

Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., and George A. Hooker and Jose F. Campos and Ron M. Campbell (Fort Lauderdale); Link & Rockenbach, PA and Kara Rockenbach Link and Daniel M. Schwarz (West Palm Beach), for appellant.

The Nation Law Firm and Mark A. Nation and Paul W. Pritchard (Longwood), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Tower Hill Prime Ins. v. Bermudez, 48 Fla. L. Weekly

D2240, 2023 WL 8246151, *3 (Fla. 3d DCA Nov. 29, 2023) (affirming trial

court’s denial of insurer’s motion for directed verdict on policy’s soil

movement exclusion because based on experts’ testimony “jury could

reasonably have concluded that it was the shock waves, and not soil or earth

movement, that shook the house and caused damage to the Insured's

home”); Feldman v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 373 So. 3d 636 (Fla. 4th DCA

2023) (explaining that directed verdict is proper on insured’s initial burden of

proof to show physical loss occurred during policy period where there is no

conflicting evidence about when damage occurred and no view of evidence

would support verdict for insurer on issue); Linn v. Fossum, 946 So. 2d 1032,

1036 (Fla. 2006) (applying harmless error analysis to defendant’s improper

bolstering of expert witness testimony).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Linn v. Fossum
946 So. 2d 1032 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Citizens Property Insurance Corporation v. Maylin Rodriguez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citizens-property-insurance-corporation-v-maylin-rodriguez-fladistctapp-2024.