Citizens Passenger Ry. v. East Harrisburg Passenger Ry.

29 A. 502, 161 Pa. 121, 35 W.N.C. 12, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 647
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 9, 1894·No. Appeal, No. 17·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal having been regularly taken by defendant company from the decree of the court below, without any special order of said court, and recognizance in the sum of $8,000, conditioned to prosecute said appeal with effect, etc., having been given by appellant and approved by said court, we are of opinion that said appeal operates as a supersedeas of all proceedings by plaintiff company under and by virtue of said decree.

It is therefore ordered and decreed that the stay of proceedings, heretofore ordered by this court, be and the same is hereby continued until the final determination of said appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Citizens Passenger Ry. v. East Harrisburg Passenger Ry., 29 A. 502, 161 Pa. 121, 35 W.N.C. 12, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 647 (Pa. 1894).

29 A. 502 (Citizens Passenger Ry. v. East Harrisburg Passenger Ry.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Thomas
451 A.2d 1215 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1982)
Williams v. Williams
74 So. 2d 582 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1954)
Martin v. Martin
66 So. 2d 268 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1953)
Githens v. Githens
239 P. 1023 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1925)
McIlroy v. McIlroy
94 N.E. 696 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)
Hobby v. Hobby
5 A.D. 496 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)