Citizens National Bank v. Mintz

245 A.D. 759
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order granting motion for judgment on the pleadings and the judgment entered thereon reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. To entitle a plaintiff to summary judgment, where an answer sets up section 1077-b of the Civil Practice Act as a defense, it must appear without contradiction that an action is maintainable to foreclose a mortgage given simultaneously as security for the payment of a note. The complaint in tMs case does not allege that interest on the note is due and remains unpaid, nor that taxes remain unpaid after notice and demand. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Citizens National Bank v. Mintz, 245 A.D. 759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

245 A.D. 759 (Citizens National Bank v. Mintz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Milanese v. Azzarone
162 Misc. 329 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)