Citizens National Bank v. Commissioner

5 B.T.A. 156
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedOctober 21, 1926
DocketDocket No. 6148
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 B.T.A. 156 (Citizens National Bank v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Citizens National Bank v. Commissioner, 5 B.T.A. 156 (bta 1926).

Opinion

[157]*157OPINION.

Smith:

Section 234(a) (5) of the Revenue Act of 1921 permits a corporation to deduct from gross income in its tax return:

Debts ascertained to be worthless and charged off within the taxable year (or in the discretion of the Commissioner, a reasonable addition to a reserve for bad debts) ; and when satisfied that a debt is recoverable only in part, the Commissioner may allow such debt to be charged off in part.

It ivas very evident to the stockholders of the petitioner bank on February 28, 1921, that it would not be able to recover the full amount of its accounts receivable. The reason for winding up the [158]*158affairs of the bank were that it was realized that losses must be sustained by it which would probably compel it to be dissolved. We are satisfied from the evidence adduced that the petitioner had ascertained that accounts receivable in an amount in excess of $18,183.18,— the net income determined by the Commissioner for the two-month period ended February 28, 1921, — were worthless and included in a reserve for bad debts.

Judgment will he entered for the petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Citizens Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner
5 B.T.A. 156 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 B.T.A. 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citizens-national-bank-v-commissioner-bta-1926.