CITIZENS INS. CO. v. Scholz
712 N.W.2d 475, 474 Mich. 1127
Opinion
CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
F.C. SCHOLZ, III, and Bultsma Excavating Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and
Hoonhorst Concrete, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*476 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 8, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
CITIZENS INS. CO. v. Scholz, 712 N.W.2d 475, 474 Mich. 1127 (Mich. 2006).
712 N.W.2d 475 (CITIZENS INS. CO. v. Scholz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.