Citizens for Choice v. Summit Cty. Council

93 Ohio St. 3d 1256

• Court: Ohio Supreme Court
• Decided: September 17, 2001
• Docket: 01-1046
• Status: Published

Opinion

Summit App. No. 20117. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal as of right. On June 7, 2001, appellants filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellants have neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellants show cause within ten days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 111(6).