Citizens Bank v. Reese

88 S.E. 570, 145 Ga. 110, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 199
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 14, 1916·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. In an action by the holder of a promissory note as transferee, a special plea setting up that the defendant was induced to sign the note by specified acts of fraud upon the part of the payee, that it was. without consideration, and that the plaintiff took the note with notice of such fraud and failure of consideration, was not subject to demurrer.

2. The pleadings and evidence did not present an issue on the subject of the plaintiff’s having procured the note from the payee by fraud, which in law might operate to let in the defense of failure of consideration as mentioned in the first headnote. It was harmful error for the judge to submit such an issue to the jury.

3. None of the other grounds of the motion for new trial are sufficient to require a new trial, or of such character as to require elaboration.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Citizens Bank v. Reese, 88 S.E. 570, 145 Ga. 110, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 199 (Ga. 1916).

88 S.E. 570 (Citizens Bank v. Reese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clarke County School District v. Madden
110 S.E.2d 47 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Strickland
74 S.E.2d 897 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Haslerig v. Watson
54 S.E.2d 413 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)
Roberts v. Allen
122 S.E. 86 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Watson v. American National Bank
93 S.E. 38 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)