Citizens Bank v. Moultrie Banking Co.
This text of 140 S.E. 895 (Citizens Bank v. Moultrie Banking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
While the evidence of the claimant bank’s official, the only witness in the ease, was not altogether clear and comprehensive concerning all the matters testified to, yet since it was altogether undisputed, and since it was distinct and positive upon the salient issue of title, and since every reasonable deduction which could be drawn from his entire testimony went to establish the claimant’s ownership of the property, the court did not err in directing a verdict accordingly.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 S.E. 895, 37 Ga. App. 548, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citizens-bank-v-moultrie-banking-co-gactapp-1927.