Citizens Bank v. Fulwood & Murray

75 S.E. 824, 11 Ga. App. 488, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 74
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 24, 1912
Docket3735
StatusPublished

This text of 75 S.E. 824 (Citizens Bank v. Fulwood & Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Citizens Bank v. Fulwood & Murray, 75 S.E. 824, 11 Ga. App. 488, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 74 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Russell, J.

The controlling issue in this case being whether the employment of the attorney was joint on the part of the two banks, or whether there were several undertakings of the attorney to represent each of the said corporations in a proposed combination, which did not materialize, and there being evidence that the services were necessarily separate up to the time of the attempted consolidation, and that there was no contract of joint employment, the verdict is supported by the evidence. There being no error of law assigned, there was no error in refusing a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 S.E. 824, 11 Ga. App. 488, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citizens-bank-v-fulwood-murray-gactapp-1912.