Citizens Bank v. C.L.R. Brooklyn Realty Corp.
This text of 5 A.D.3d 528 (Citizens Bank v. C.L.R. Brooklyn Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants C.L.R. Brooklyn Realty Corp., Leonard Peter Smith, and Pearl Smith appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated November 19, 2002, which denied their motions, among other things, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale dated July 13, 1994, and to cancel a referee’s deed issued on July 12, 1995, and strike it from the public record.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court correctly determined that the appellants’ motions, inter alia, to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale and to cancel the referee’s deed were barred by the doctrine of res judicata because the claims contained therein could have or should have been raised on the defendants’ first motion, brought in 1995, to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale (see O’Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353, 357 [1981]; Coliseum Towers Assoc. v County of Nassau, 217 AD2d 387 [1996]).
[529]*529The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., S. Miller, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 A.D.3d 528, 772 N.Y.S.2d 870, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citizens-bank-v-clr-brooklyn-realty-corp-nyappdiv-2004.