Citizens' Bank v. Benachi
This text of 38 La. Ann. 376 (Citizens' Bank v. Benachi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The defendant appeals from a judgment dissolving an injunction obtained by him, arresting executory process issued against real estate, mortgaged by him to secure the payment of the note sued on.
The grounds upon which the writ issued, as set forth in the original and supplemental petitions, are: want of consideration; extinguishment by remission; prematurity resulting from inexpiration of extension of time.
It suffices to say that not only are the defenses inconsistent, but that the record is barren of evidence in support of either.
The appellee has prayed for damages for a frivolous appeal, and is-entitled to recover same.
The claim bears eight per cent interest, and the debtor is to pay five per cent attorney’s fees: The claim is for $3,298. We -think one hundred dollars a reasonable allowance for such damages.
It is therefore ordered that the judgment appealed from be affirmed,, and that appellee recover further one hundred dollars for a frivolous-appeal and costs in both courts.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 La. Ann. 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citizens-bank-v-benachi-la-1886.