Citizens Bank, N.A. v. Bolomet
This text of Citizens Bank, N.A. v. Bolomet (Citizens Bank, N.A. v. Bolomet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 22-JUL-2025 08:37 AM Dkt. 40 ODSD NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
CITIZENS BANK, N.A. fka RBS CITIZENS N.A. and CITIZENS BANK OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v. PASCAL CHRISTOPHE BOLOMET, Defendant-Appellee; and ROUTH THERESA SOUZE BOLOMET, Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appelant, and CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE SECTION, Defendant-Appellee, and JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 1-10; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10; DOE ENTITIES 1-10 AND DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-10, Defendants, and MOR ELKESLASSY, Purchaser-Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 1CC161000893)
ORDER (By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, Leonard, and Wadsworth, JJ.)
Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) The statement of jurisdiction and opening brief were due on or before May 19, 2025, and June 18, 2025, respectively; (2) Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant Routh Theresa Souza Bolomet (Routh Bolomet) failed to file either document, or request an extension of time; (3) On June 19, 2025, the appellate clerk entered a default notice informing Routh Bolomet that the time for filing the statement of jurisdiction and opening brief had expired, the
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Citizens Bank, N.A. v. Bolomet, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citizens-bank-na-v-bolomet-hawapp-2025.