Citizens Bank, N.A. v. Bolomet

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 22-JUL-2025 08:37 AM Dkt. 40 ODSD NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

CITIZENS BANK, N.A. fka RBS CITIZENS N.A. and CITIZENS BANK OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v. PASCAL CHRISTOPHE BOLOMET, Defendant-Appellee; and ROUTH THERESA SOUZE BOLOMET, Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appelant, and CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE SECTION, Defendant-Appellee, and JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 1-10; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10; DOE ENTITIES 1-10 AND DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-10, Defendants, and MOR ELKESLASSY, Purchaser-Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 1CC161000893)

ORDER (By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, Leonard, and Wadsworth, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) The statement of jurisdiction and opening brief were due on or before May 19, 2025, and June 18, 2025, respectively; (2) Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant Routh Theresa Souza Bolomet (Routh Bolomet) failed to file either document, or request an extension of time; (3) On June 19, 2025, the appellate clerk entered a default notice informing Routh Bolomet that the time for filing the statement of jurisdiction and opening brief had expired, the