Citizen Potawatomi Nation v. Norton

257 F.3d 1158, 2001 WL 823719
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided July 9, 2001·No. No. 99-6077·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER

On consideration of the petition for rehearing en banc, rehearing by the panel is granted for the limited purpose of a modification of the panel opinion. The modified opinion removes the sentence at the bottom of page 11 and the top of page 12 of the slip opinion which stated: “We did not hold, however, that the United States could not provide that proof.” A copy of the modified opinion is attached to this order.

The petition for rehearing en banc having been circulated to all the judges of the panel and all of the active circuit judges in regular service, and no request for a poll on the en banc suggestion having been made, rehearing en banc is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Citizen Potawatomi Nation v. Norton, 257 F.3d 1158, 2001 WL 823719 (10th Cir. 2001).

257 F.3d 1158 (Citizen Potawatomi Nation v. Norton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fletcher v. United States
153 F. Supp. 3d 1354 (N.D. Oklahoma, 2015)
Citizen Potawatomi Nation v. Salazar
624 F. Supp. 2d 103 (District of Columbia, 2009)
Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. Thompson
311 F.3d 1054 (Tenth Circuit, 2002)
Cherokee Nation v. Thompson
311 F.3d 1054 (Tenth Circuit, 2002)