Citicorp Vendor Finance, Inc. v. Island Garden Basketball, Inc.

27 A.D.3d 608, 810 N.Y.S.2d 673
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 21, 2006
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 27 A.D.3d 608 (Citicorp Vendor Finance, Inc. v. Island Garden Basketball, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Citicorp Vendor Finance, Inc. v. Island Garden Basketball, Inc., 27 A.D.3d 608, 810 N.Y.S.2d 673 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

[609]*609In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant Michele Cochrane, sued herein as Michelle Cochrane, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated July 1, 2005, which denied her motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (3), in effect, to vacate so much of an order and judgment of the same court entered August 20, 2003, as granted those branches of the plaintiffs motion which were for summary judgment on the third and fourth causes of action insofar as asserted against her, upon her failure to oppose the motion, and was in favor of the plaintiff and against her in the principal sum of $67,469.04.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant unreasonably delayed making her motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (3), in effect, to vacate stated portions of the order and judgment (see Richardson v Richardson, 309 AD2d 795, 796 [2003]; Green Point Sav. Bank v Arnold, 260 AD2d 543 [1999]). Moreover, the appellant failed to establish that the plaintiff procured the order and judgment by fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct (see CPLR 5015 [a] [3]; Blumes v Madar, 21 AD3d 518, 520 [2005]; Badgett v Badgett, 2 AD3d 379 [2003]; Feldstein v Rounick, 295 AD2d 398, 399 [2002]; Caiola v Allcity Ins. Co., 257 AD2d 586, 588 [1999]; cf. Oppenheimer v Westcott, 47 NY2d 595, 604 [1979]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the appellant’s motion. Miller, J.P., Crane, Krausman and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duryea PL, LLC v. Wright
77 Misc. 3d 139(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Pradeep Agarwal, CPA, P.C. v. Bachu Law Firm, P.C.
69 Misc. 3d 126(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Pei Qi Chen v. Chen
2020 NY Slip Op 4565 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Community West Bank, N.A. v. Stephen
2017 NY Slip Op 6349 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Sealey v. Westend Gardens Housing Development Fund Co.
97 A.D.3d 653 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Levy v. Prime East 15th, LLC
89 A.D.3d 1066 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Tribeca Lending Corp. v. Crawford
79 A.D.3d 1018 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Katz v. Marra
74 A.D.3d 888 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In re the Estate of Tellez
56 A.D.2d 678 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Czernicki v. Lawniczak
41 A.D.3d 418 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 A.D.3d 608, 810 N.Y.S.2d 673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citicorp-vendor-finance-inc-v-island-garden-basketball-inc-nyappdiv-2006.