Citicorp USA, Inc. v. PM Holdings, LLC
This text of 29 A.D.3d 363 (Citicorp USA, Inc. v. PM Holdings, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered January 13, 2006, which denied defendant Morton’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about January 13, 2006, which granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Morton’s guaranty is absolute and unconditional, and waives “[a]ny and all defenses to payment.” This precludes his argument that the November 2001 amendment to the loan agreement impermissibly modified the guaranty (see 117-14 Union Turnpike Assoc. v County Dollar Corp., 187 AD2d 357 [1992]). Were we to reach that argument, we would uphold his advance consent in the guaranty to any modifications or amendments of [364]*364the loan agreement (see Banque Worms v Andre Cafe, 183 AD2d 494 [1992]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Saxe, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 A.D.3d 363, 813 N.Y.S.2d 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citicorp-usa-inc-v-pm-holdings-llc-nyappdiv-2006.