Home/Connecticut Superior Court/Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Darling, No. Cv88 25 41 43 S (May 19, 1993)

Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Darling, No. Cv88 25 41 43 S (May 19, 1993)

1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 4903
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedMay 19, 1993
DocketNo. CV88 25 41 43 S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 4903 (Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Darling, No. Cv88 25 41 43 S (May 19, 1993)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Darling, No. Cv88 25 41 43 S (May 19, 1993), 1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 4903 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM ON MOTION TO REPOEN JUDGMENT The motion to reopen the judgment based on alleged fraud is denied since under 49-15 a final judgment of foreclosure cannot be opened after title has vested in any encumbrancer. Bank of Stamford v. Alaimo, 31 Conn. App. 1, 8. While fraud may be grounds for collateral attack in an independent action in equity, it cannot be used to reopen the judgment after title has passed. Merry-Go-Round Enterprises, Inc. v. Molnar, 10 Conn. App. 160, 162 n.

ROBERT A. FULLER, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Merry-Go-Round Enterprises, Inc. v. Molnar
521 A.2d 1065 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1987)
Bank of Stamford v. Alaimo
622 A.2d 1057 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 4903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citicorp-mortgage-inc-v-darling-no-cv88-25-41-43-s-may-19-1993-connsuperct-1993.