Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Darling, No. Cv88 25 41 43 S (May 19, 1993)

Connecticut Superior Court

Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Darling, No. Cv88 25 41 43 S (May 19, 1993)

1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 4903

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided May 19, 1993·No. No. CV88 25 41 43 S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM ON MOTION TO REPOEN JUDGMENT The motion to reopen the judgment based on alleged fraud is denied since under 49-15 a final judgment of foreclosure cannot be opened after title has vested in any encumbrancer. Bank of Stamford v. Alaimo, 31 Conn. App. 1, 8. While fraud may be grounds for collateral attack in an independent action in equity, it cannot be used to reopen the judgment after title has passed. Merry-Go-Round Enterprises, Inc. v. Molnar, 10 Conn. App. 160, 162 n.

ROBERT A. FULLER, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM ON MOTION TO REPOEN JUDGMENT The motion to reopen the judgment based on alleged fraud is denied since under 49-15 a final judgment of foreclosure cannot be opened after title has vested in any encumbrancer. Bank of Stamford v. Alaimo, 31 Conn. App. 1, 8. While fraud may be grounds for collateral attack in an independent action in equity, it cannot be used to reopen the judgment after title has passed. Merry-Go-Round Enterprises, Inc. v. Molnar, 10 Conn. App. 160, 162 n.

ROBERT A. FULLER, JUDGE

Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Darling, No. Cv88 25 41 43 S (May 19, 1993), 1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 4903 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 4903 (Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Darling, No. Cv88 25 41 43 S (May 19, 1993)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related