Citibank v. Freitas
This text of Citibank v. Freitas (Citibank v. Freitas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0000208 24-OCT-2014 10:22 AM
SCWC-13-0000208
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I ________________________________________________________________
CITIBANK, N.A., Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
CINDY K. FREITAS, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0000208; CIV. NO. 3RC11-1-981K)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Cindy K. Freitas’s application for writ of certiorari filed on September 17, 2014, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 24, 2014.
Cindy K. Freitas /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald petitioner pro se /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Citibank v. Freitas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citibank-v-freitas-haw-2014.