Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Schumacher
This text of 158 F. App'x 907 (Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Schumacher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Joan Schumacher appeals pro se the district court’s order remanding this action to state court. We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s remand order. See United Investors Life Ins. Co. v. Waddell & Reed, Inc., 360 F.3d 960, 963 (9th Cir.2004) (under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(b) courts of appeals lack jurisdiction to review remand orders based on jurisdiction). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 F. App'x 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citibank-south-dakota-na-v-schumacher-ca9-2005.