Citibank, N.A. v. Peters

49 V.I. 772, 2008 WL 819899, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31520
CourtDistrict Court, Virgin Islands
DecidedMarch 17, 2008
DocketCivil No. 2002-112
StatusPublished

This text of 49 V.I. 772 (Citibank, N.A. v. Peters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, Virgin Islands primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Citibank, N.A. v. Peters, 49 V.I. 772, 2008 WL 819899, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31520 (vid 2008).

Opinion

GÓMEZ, Chief Judge

JUDGMENT

(March 17, 2008)

Before the Court is the motion of plaintiff, Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”), for summary judgment against defendants Charles M. Peters (“Peters”), LPP Mortgage, Ltd. (“LPP”), Pramco II, LLC (“Pramco”), and Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“BPPR”). The motion is unopposed. Upon review of the motion and all supporting materials attached hereto, the Court finds:

[773]*7731. Peters owns real property described as Parcel No. 14-67 Frenchman’s Bay Estate, No. 4 Frenchman’s Bay Quarter, consisting of 0.535 U.S. acres as shown on P.W.D. No. A9-176-T72, St. Thomas, United States Virgin Islands (the “Property”).

2. On June 26, 1995, Peters entered into a loan agreement with Citibank. This agreement is evidenced by a note Peters executed and delivered to Citibank in the amount of $208,000, plus interest at a rate of 8.125% per annum, payable in monthly installments (“the Citibank Note”).

3. As security for repayment of the Citibank Note, on or about the same day, Peters executed and delivered a first priority mortgage (the “Citibank Mortgage”) over the Property. The Citibank Mortgage was recorded on the same day at the office of the Recorder of Deeds, Division of St. Thomas & St. John, in Book No. 44-W, at Page 358, Auxiliary 43, at Page 188, as Document No. 3127.

4. On January 20, 1996, Peters entered into a loan agreement with the U.S. Small Business Association (“SBA”). Peters executed and delivered to the SBA a promissory note in the amount of $32,500. As security for repayment of this note, Peters executed and delivered a mortgage over the Property to SBA. This mortgage was recorded with the Recorder on February 13, 1996, in Book 45-V, at Page 403, as Document No. 929. This note and mortgage was thereafter assigned to Pramco on May 2, 2001 and recorded with the Recorder of Deeds on August 21, 2001, as Document No. 2001004162.

5. On January 26, 1996, entered into another loan agreement with the SBA. Peters executed and delivered to the SBA a promissory note in the principal amount of $24,300. As security for the repayment of this note, Peters executed and delivered to the SBA a mortgage over the Property. This mortgage was recorded on February 13, 1996, in Book 45-V, at Page 399, as Document No. 928. This note and mortgage was thereafter assigned to LPP on May 2, 2001, and recorded with the Recorder of Deeds on July 13, 2001, as Document No. 2001003300.

6. On February 5, 2000, BPPR obtained a default judgment against Peters. BPPR then filed a judgment lien against the Property in the amount of $54,090.37. The judgment lien was recorded with the Recorder of Deeds on February 9, 2000, as Document No. 2000000684.

[774]*7747. Peters is in default under the terms and conditions of the Citibank Note and Citibank Mortgage for failing to make timely payments of principal and interest when they became due.

8. On October 30, 2000, Citibank made demand upon Peters for payment of outstanding principal, interest, and late charges.

9. Peters failed to cure his defaults within the time provided and failed to pay all principal and interest due as demanded. As a result, Citibank accelerated the sums due under the Citibank Note.

10. On June 6, 2002, Citibank brought the instant action for debt and foreclosure of the Mortgage against Peters.

11. On or about June 24, 2002, Peters filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code, which was later amended to Chapter 7.

12. On July 3, 2003, Peters received a discharge of his personal debts in bankruptcy. Citibank then filed a motion to amend its complaint. This motion was granted by the Court in an Order dated November 3, 2003.1 Thereafter, LPP and Pramco were added as junior lienholders.

13. As of November 30, 2006, Peters is indebted to Citibank as follows: principal in the amount of $197,765.59, plus accrued interest in the amount of $101,704.67, plus escrow advances in the amount of $36,414.43, plus outstanding late charges in the amount of $5791.50, plus fees for inspection and appraisal of the Property in the amount of $358.00, for a total amount of $342,034.19. Interest continues to accrue at the rate of $44.0232 per diem from November 30, 2006, until the date of Judgment. After the entry of Judgment, interest will continue to accrue at the statutory rate until Judgment is satisfied. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Citibank’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that Citibank holds a first-priority lien against the Property; LPP holds a second-priority lien against the Property; Pramco holds a third-priority lien against the Property; and BPPR holds a fourth-priority lien against the Property; and it is further

[775]*775ORDERED that Citibank is awarded final judgment against Peters in the principal sum of $197,765.59, plus accrued interest in the amount of $101,704.67, plus escrow advances in the amount of $36,414.43, plus outstanding late charges in the amount of $5791.50, plus fees for inspection and appraisal of the Property for a total amount of $342,034.19. Interest continues to accrue after November 30, 2006, at the rate of $44.0232 per diem until the date of this Judgment. Interest will accrue at the statutory rate of 4% per annum from the date of this Judgment until this Judgment is satisfied; and it is further

ORDERED that Citibank shall recover from Peters it’s costs and attorney’s fees in an amount to be determined upon the filing of an appropriate application for an award of costs and attorneys’ fees made any time prior to the entry of an order confirming sale of the Property; and it is further

ORDERED that the Citibank Mortgage, the LPP Mortgage, the Pramco Mortgage, the BPPR judgment lien, and all other liens subsequent or inferior to the Citibank Mortgage are hereby FORECLOSED; and it is further

ORDERED that the Property shall be sold by the United States Marshals according to the law, and that the proceeds of such sale shall be applied first to the expenses associated with any sale, including but not limited to the costs of publication and the commission assessed by the United States Marshals Service pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1921, and then toward satisfaction of this Judgment in favor of Citibank, including any costs and attorney’s fees that may be awarded in this matter upon application, and any sums that may be paid for insurance premiums, taxes, and expenditures necessary to maintain the Property prior to sale; and it is further

ORDERED that:

1. Pursuant to V.I. Code Ann. tit. 5, § 484, notice of the Marshal’s sale shall be posted for four weeks prior to the sale in a public place in or near the Office of the Clerk of the Court; and published once a week for at least four consecutive weeks prior to the sale in a newspaper regularly issued and of general circulation in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The notice shall describe the Property as set out above and shall contain the terms and conditions of sale as set out herein.

2. The terms and conditions of the sale shall be as follows:

[776]*776a. The Property shall be seized and sold as separately at a public sale at the Office of the U.S.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 V.I. 772, 2008 WL 819899, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citibank-na-v-peters-vid-2008.