CITIBANK, NA v. Montgomery

Michigan Supreme Court

CITIBANK, NA v. Montgomery

715 N.W.2d 896, 475 Mich. 889, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 1263

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 26, 2006·No. 130751·Published

Opinion

715 N.W.2d 896 (2006) 475 Mich. 889

CITIBANK, NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Duane MONTGOMERY, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 130751. COA No. 264952.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 26, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 3, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to consolidate and the motion for sanctions are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

715 N.W.2d 896 (2006) 475 Mich. 889

CITIBANK, NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Duane MONTGOMERY, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 130751. COA No. 264952.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 26, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 3, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to consolidate and the motion for sanctions are DENIED.

CITIBANK, NA v. Montgomery, 715 N.W.2d 896, 475 Mich. 889, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 1263 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

715 N.W.2d 896 (CITIBANK, NA v. Montgomery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

CITIBANK, NA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Duane MONTGOMERY, Defendant-Appellant.

CITIBANK, NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Duane MONTGOMERY, Defendant-Appellant.