Citibank, N.A. v. Kallman
This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 3679 (Citibank, N.A. v. Kallman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Citibank, N.A. v Kallman |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 03679 |
| Decided on May 9, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on May 9, 2019
Renwick, J.P., Kapnick, Kahn, Oing, JJ.
9272 810107/10
v
Marc Scott Kallman, Defendant-Appellant, Board of Managers of 52 East End Avenue Condominium Homeowners Association, et al., Defendants.
Solomon Rosengarten, Brooklyn, for appellant.
Houser & Allison, APC, New York (Kathleen M. Massimo of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Lynn R. Kotler, J.), entered September 27, 2017, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff's motion to amend the judgment, nunc pro tunc, unanimously dismissed, without costs.
The original judgment of foreclosure and sale was entered upon defendant's default (the court struck his answer) which he
never remedied. No appeal lies from an order or judgment entered on default (CPLR 5511).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: MAY 9, 2019
CLERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2019 NY Slip Op 3679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citibank-na-v-kallman-nyappdiv-2019.