Citibank, N.A. v. Bailey

219 A.D.3d 1717, 195 N.Y.S.3d 863, 2023 NY Slip Op 04900
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 29, 2023·No. MOTION NO. (965/22) CA 22-00002.·Published

Opinion

Citibank, N.A. v Bailey (2023 NY Slip Op 04900)
Citibank, N.A. v Bailey
2023 NY Slip Op 04900
Decided on September 29, 2023
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on September 29, 2023
PRESENT: LINDLEY, J.P., BANNISTER, MONTOUR, AND GREENWOOD, JJ. (Filed Sept. 29, 2023.)
MOTION NO. (965/22) CA 22-00002.

[*1]CITIBANK, N.A., NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE OF NRZ PASS-THROUGH TRUST VI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

ARTHUR BAILEY, AS HEIR TO THE ESTATE OF DAVID B. BAILEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Citibank, N.A. v. Bailey, 219 A.D.3d 1717, 195 N.Y.S.3d 863, 2023 NY Slip Op 04900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

219 A.D.3d 1717 (Citibank, N.A. v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431