Citibank, N. A. v. Term Pearl Street Garage Corp.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Greenfield, J.), entered March 15, 1996, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on its complaint and dismissing defendant’s counterclaim, unanimously aifirmed, with costs.
We agree with the IAS Court that plaintiff has cured the deficiencies in its prima facie case mentioned in the prior appeal (203 AD2d 52) with specific allegations and detailed documentary evidence substantiating its claim of a material breach of the loan restructuring agreement and that defendant’s repeated, general denials of any such breach lack evidentiary support and do not raise any issue of fact. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
235 A.D.2d 303 (Citibank, N. A. v. Term Pearl Street Garage Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.