Citibank, N. A. v. Saratoga Condominium

202 A.D.2d 465, 610 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2399
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 14, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, for a declaration that the defendants possess no claim or lien for [466]*466common charges against an apartment unit located in the codefendant Saratoga Condominium, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Burrows, J.), dated March 13, 1992, as granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and extinguished their alleged lien for common charges.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the plaintiff Citibank, N. A., declaring, inter alia, that the defendants have no lien or claim for common charges against a certain apartment unit located in the Saratoga Condominium (see, Bankers Trust Co. v Board of Mgrs., 81 NY2d 1033, 1034; see also, Real Property Law §§ 339-z, 339-aa; CPLR 6501; 7A Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac f 6501.13). Thompson, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Citibank, N. A. v. Saratoga Condominium, 202 A.D.2d 465, 610 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2399 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

202 A.D.2d 465 (Citibank, N. A. v. Saratoga Condominium) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilmington Sav. Fund Socy., FSB v. Genova
2025 NY Slip Op 01665 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)