CIT Bank N.A v. Pamela Schiffman
This text of CIT Bank N.A v. Pamela Schiffman (CIT Bank N.A v. Pamela Schiffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
State of New York Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.
No. 36 CIT Bank N.A., Respondent, v. Pamela Schiffman, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Samuel Katz, for appellants. Stephen J. Vargas, for respondent.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Certification of questions by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, pursuant to section 500.27 of this Court’s Rules of Practice, accepted and the issues presented are to be considered after briefing and argument. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.
Decided February 13, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
CIT Bank N.A v. Pamela Schiffman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cit-bank-na-v-pamela-schiffman-ny-2020.