Cisney v. Creighton Manor Realty Co.
This text of 206 A.D. 776 (Cisney v. Creighton Manor Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on the law, and complaint unanimously dismissed, with costs. It is dear that it was required that plaintiff's offer to [777]*777purchase to be effective should be accepted by the defendant; this he failed to prove, the record disclosing that the meeting of April 6, 1920, was not attended by all the directors, and was not held after notice to each director as required by the by-laws. The action taken at the meeting was, therefore, ineffectual to bind the defendant. (Gerard v. Empire Square Really Co., 195 App. Div. 244.) Present — Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Young, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
206 A.D. 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cisney-v-creighton-manor-realty-co-nyappdiv-1923.