Cisney v. Creighton Manor Realty Co.

206 A.D. 776
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1923·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law, and complaint unanimously dismissed, with costs. It is dear that it was required that plaintiff's offer to [777] purchase to be effective should be accepted by the defendant; this he failed to prove, the record disclosing that the meeting of April 6, 1920, was not attended by all the directors, and was not held after notice to each director as required by the by-laws. The action taken at the meeting was, therefore, ineffectual to bind the defendant. (Gerard v. Empire Square Really Co., 195 App. Div. 244.) Present — Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Young, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cisney v. Creighton Manor Realty Co., 206 A.D. 776 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

206 A.D. 776 (Cisney v. Creighton Manor Realty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MacHne Menachem, Inc. v. Hershkop
237 F. Supp. 2d 227 (E.D. New York, 2002)