Cisneros v. Nevada Department of Corrections

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided March 20, 2024·No. 3:23-cv-00629·Unknown

Opinion

MARIO CISNEROS, Case No. 3:23-cv-00629-LRH-CSD J Plaintiff, ORDER ° NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF Defendant. 9] I. DISCUSSION Plaintiff Mario Cisneros brings this counseled civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for events that took place when he was in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections. (ECF Nos. 1, 6). Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated and has paid the $405 filing fee for a civil action. As such, this case will proceed onto the normal litigation track and will not be screened. See generally 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (the plaintiff is no longer a prisoner within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act); see Olivas v. Nevada ex rel. Dep't of Corr., 856 F.3d 1281, 1282 (9th Cir. 2017) (holding that “28 U.S.C. § 1915A applies only to claims brought by individuals incarcerated at the time they file their complaints”); see Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (recognizing that screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) applies to actions filed in forma pauperis whether or not the plaintiff is incarcerated). } Il. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that this case is not subject to screening and will proceed onto the normal litigation track pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DATED THIS 20" day of March, 2024. .

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cisneros v. Nevada Department of Corrections, (D. Nev. 2024).

Cisneros v. Nevada Department of Corrections (Cisneros v. Nevada Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Olivas v. Nevada Ex Rel. Department of Corrections
856 F.3d 1281 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Lopez v. Smith
203 F.3d 1122 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)