Cisneros v. American Airlines, Inc.

155 So. 3d 468, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 405, 2015 WL 160706
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 14, 2015
DocketNo. 3D14-2084
StatusPublished

This text of 155 So. 3d 468 (Cisneros v. American Airlines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cisneros v. American Airlines, Inc., 155 So. 3d 468, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 405, 2015 WL 160706 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

SUAREZ, J.

Following review of the petition for writ of certiorari and the response and reply thereto, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied. See Rodriguez v. Miami-Dade County, 117 So.3d 400, 404 (Fla.2013) (“Only after irreparable harm has been shown can an appellate court then review whether the petitioner has also shown a departure from the essential requirements of law”). Petitioner may depose defendant Eulen American, Inc. regarding the matters at issue. As such, at this point, there is no irreparable harm that requires the issuance of a writ of certiorari.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodriguez v. Miami-Dade County
117 So. 3d 400 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 So. 3d 468, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 405, 2015 WL 160706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cisneros-v-american-airlines-inc-fladistctapp-2015.