Cisneros v. American Airlines, Etc.
This text of Cisneros v. American Airlines, Etc. (Cisneros v. American Airlines, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed January 14, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D14-2084 Lower Tribunal No. 12-38028 ________________
Elvira R. Hoyle Cisneros, Petitioner,
vs.
American Airlines, Inc., and Eulen American, Inc., Respondents.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Appellate Division, Daryl E. Trawick, Judges.
Philip D. Parrish and Julio C. Jaramillo, for petitioner.
Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell and Gregory M. Palmer and K. Abigail Roberts, for respondent American Airlines, Inc., and Mitchel E. Kallet (Palm Beach Gardens), for respondent Eulen American, Inc.
Before SUAREZ, LAGOA, and SCALES, JJ.
SUAREZ, J.
Following review of the petition for writ of certiorari and the response and
reply thereto, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied. See Rodriguez v. Miami–Dade County, 117 So. 3d 400, 404 (Fla. 2013) (“Only after irreparable
harm has been shown can an appellate court then review whether the petitioner has
also shown a departure from the essential requirements of law”). Petitioner may
depose defendant Eulen American, Inc. regarding the matters at issue. As such, at
this point, there is no irreparable harm that requires the issuance of a writ of
certiorari.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cisneros v. American Airlines, Etc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cisneros-v-american-airlines-etc-fladistctapp-2015.