Cisneros, Raquel Flores v. Cisneros, Jose Angel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Cisneros, Raquel Flores v. Cisneros, Jose Angel

DecidedJune 15, 2000

Docket13-00-00187-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Cisneros, Raquel Flores v. Cisneros, Jose Angel (Cisneros, Raquel Flores v. Cisneros, Jose Angel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cisneros, Raquel Flores v. Cisneros, Jose Angel, (Tex. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-00-187-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

RAQUEL FLORES CISNEROS

, Appellant,

v.

JOSE ANGEL CISNERO

S, Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 103rd District Court of Cameron County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Chief Justice Seerden and Justices Rodriguez and Kennedy⁽¹⁾

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, RAQUEL FLORES CISNEROS, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 103rd District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 98-12-4868-D. Judgment in this cause was signed on November 16, 1999. A timely motion for new trial was filed on December 2, 1999. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a), appellant's notice of appeal was due on February 14, 2000, but was not filed until February 23, 2000.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

Additionally, on April 5, 2000, appellant was advised that she was delinquent in remitting the $125.00 filing fee. Notice was given that, unless the filing fee was paid within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's notice, the appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). To date, appellant has failed to pay the filing fee.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, appellant's failure to remit the filing fee, and appellant's failure to respond to this Court's notices, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 15^th day of June, 2000.

1. Retired Justice Noah Kennedy assigned to this Court by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas pursuant to Tex.Gov't Code Ann. § 744.003 (Vernon 1998).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-00-187-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

RAQUEL FLORES CISNEROS

, Appellant,

v.

JOSE ANGEL CISNERO

S, Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 103rd District Court of Cameron County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Chief Justice Seerden and Justices Rodriguez and Kennedy⁽¹⁾

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, RAQUEL FLORES CISNEROS, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 103rd District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 98-12-4868-D. Judgment in this cause was signed on November 16, 1999. A timely motion for new trial was filed on December 2, 1999. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a), appellant's notice of appeal was due on February 14, 2000, but was not filed until February 23, 2000.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

Additionally, on April 5, 2000, appellant was advised that she was delinquent in remitting the $125.00 filing fee. Notice was given that, unless the filing fee was paid within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's notice, the appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). To date, appellant has failed to pay the filing fee.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, appellant's failure to remit the filing fee, and appellant's failure to respond to this Court's notices, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 15^th day of June, 2000.

1. Retired Justice Noah Kennedy assigned to this Court by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas pursuant to Tex.Gov't Code Ann. § 744.003 (Vernon 1998).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Cisneros, Raquel Flores v. Cisneros, Jose Angel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cisneros-raquel-flores-v-cisneros-jose-angel-texapp-2000.