Cisco v. State

126 So. 610, 23 Ala. App. 446, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 72
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 4, 1930
Docket8 Div. 929.
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 126 So. 610 (Cisco v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cisco v. State, 126 So. 610, 23 Ala. App. 446, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 72 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

SAMEORD, J.

There is no indictment in this case. The trial was had on a complaint sworn to by M. C. Thomas, in which the defendant is charged with grand larceny, which is a felony under our statute. This in the very teeth of section 8 of the Constitution of 190L

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Poole v. State
846 So. 2d 370 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2002)
Hunt v. Tucker
875 F. Supp. 1487 (N.D. Alabama, 1995)
Ross v. State
529 So. 2d 1074 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1988)
Kennedy v. State
107 So. 2d 913 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 So. 610, 23 Ala. App. 446, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cisco-v-state-alactapp-1930.