Cisco v. State

126 So. 610, 23 Ala. App. 446, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 72
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided March 4, 1930·No. 8 Div. 929.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

SAMEORD, J.

There is no indictment in this case. The trial was had on a complaint sworn to by M. C. Thomas, in which the defendant is charged with grand larceny, which is a felony under our statute. This in the very teeth of section 8 of the Constitution of 190L

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cisco v. State, 126 So. 610, 23 Ala. App. 446, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 72 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

126 So. 610 (Cisco v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Poole v. State
846 So. 2d 370 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2002)
Hunt v. Tucker
875 F. Supp. 1487 (N.D. Alabama, 1995)
Ross v. State
529 So. 2d 1074 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1988)
Kennedy v. State
107 So. 2d 913 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1958)