Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Arista Networks, Inc.
This text of Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Arista Networks, Inc. (Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Arista Networks, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant
v.
ARISTA NETWORKS, INC., Appellee ______________________
2017-2384 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016- 00309. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JOHN C. O'QUINN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by CALVIN ALEXANDER SHANK, JASON M. WILCOX.
MATTHEW D. POWERS, Tensegrity Law Group, LLP, Redwood City, CA argued for appellee. Also represented by WILLIAM P. NELSON; LAUREN ANN DEGNAN, CHRISTOPHER DRYER, MICHAEL J. MCKEON, RALPH ADAM PHILLIPS, ANDREW L. SCHRADER, Fish & Richardson, PC, Washington, DC; STEVEN KATZ, Boston, MA. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, SCHALL and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 14, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Arista Networks, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cisco-systems-inc-v-arista-networks-inc-cafc-2018.