Cirota v. State
This text of 197 So. 3d 92 (Cirota v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the lower court’s denial of John Cirota’s motion as untimely and successive, the latest in a string of seven meritless appearances in this Court, each challenging his conviction and sentence, often on the same grounds. We caution Cirota that “additional frivolous postcon-viction appeals or petitions may result in an order barring him from further pro se filings in this court pertaining to his [2011] conviction.” See Carroll v. State, 192 So.3d 525 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 So. 3d 92, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10765, 2016 WL 3745721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cirota-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.