Cirota v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cirota v. State

197 So. 3d 92, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10765, 2016 WL 3745721

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 13, 2016·No. No. 1D16-377·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the lower court’s denial of John Cirota’s motion as untimely and successive, the latest in a string of seven meritless appearances in this Court, each challenging his conviction and sentence, often on the same grounds. We caution Cirota that “additional frivolous postcon-viction appeals or petitions may result in an order barring him from further pro se filings in this court pertaining to his [2011] conviction.” See Carroll v. State, 192 So.3d 525 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

AFFIRMED.

RAY, MAKAR and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the lower court’s denial of John Cirota’s motion as untimely and successive, the latest in a string of seven meritless appearances in this Court, each challenging his conviction and sentence, often on the same grounds. We caution Cirota that “additional frivolous postcon-viction appeals or petitions may result in an order barring him from further pro se filings in this court pertaining to his [2011] conviction.” See Carroll v. State, 192 So.3d 525 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

AFFIRMED.

RAY, MAKAR and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Cirota v. State, 197 So. 3d 92, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10765, 2016 WL 3745721 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

197 So. 3d 92 (Cirota v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related