Cirineo v. Adams

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: January 18, 2006
• Docket: 05-7257
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7257

EFRAIN N. CIRINEO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

VANESSA P. ADAMS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-05-385-2)

Submitted: December 19, 2005 Decided: January 18, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Efrain N. Cirineo, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Efrain N. Cirineo, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Cirineo v. Adams, No. CA-05-385-2 (E.D.

Va. July 19, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.*

AFFIRMED

* To the extent Cirineo may be seeking authorization under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) to file a second and successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion on the basis of the rules announced in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), such a motion should be filed in the circuit in which he was sentenced.

- 2 -